site stats

Chuharmal vs cit 1988 172 itr 250

WebGet free access to the complete judgment in Chandra Kala Sharma v. Ito on CaseMine. WebMar 19, 2024 · It is necessary, therefore, to understand the importance and scope of the principles of cross examination in income tax proceedings. The Supreme Court in the …

Case Law on Section 110 of Indian Evidence Act R.W.

WebMar 12, 2016 · The expression ‘income’ under the Act, a term of wide import, is applicable to section 69A, among others, of the Act (refer: Chuharmal vs. CIT [1988] 172 ITR 250 … WebA similar question arose before the Supreme Court in Chuharmal vs. CIT (1988) 70 CTR (SC) 88 : (1988) 172 ITR 250 (SC), and while affirming the view of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the aforesaid view was taken and the matter was decided against the assessee. bluetooth media access method https://masegurlazubia.com

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs K.I. Pavunny on 6 …

WebJan 18, 2024 · The ld. CIT (A) in the case of Shri Mohinder Singh (seller) observed that he had received a sale consideration of Rs 2,46,30,000/- from the sale of his agricultural land from Shri Malkiat Singh, whereas, the sale deed was executed at much lesser rate. WebIn Ashok Kumar vs. CIT (1986) 53 CTR (MP) 226 : (1986) 160 ITR 497 (MP), the question that arose for decision was whether the Tribunal was justified in refusing to accept the assessee’s explanation given in respect of cash amounting to Rs. 16,000. ... In Chuharmal vs. CIT (1988) 70 CTR (SC) 88 : (1988) 172 ITR 250 (SC), some wrist ... WebThe CIT (Appeals), therefore, confirmed the levy of penalty in respect of the concealed income of Rs. 5,73,044. The CIT (Appeals) also relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Chuharmal v. CIT[1988] 172 ITR 250/38 Taxman 190, CIT v. bluetooth mechless stereo

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : …

Category:K.P Zeenath, Calicut v. ACIT, Calicut Income Tax Appellate …

Tags:Chuharmal vs cit 1988 172 itr 250

Chuharmal vs cit 1988 172 itr 250

M/S Hari Om Dia Jewe... v. The Asst. Commission...

WebGet free access to the complete judgment in Commissioner Of Income Tax v. India Sea Foods. on CaseMine. WebIn Chuharmal's case [1988] 172 ITR 250 (SC), the facts, briefly, were that in January, 1974, on the basis of the order passed by the Superintendent, Central Excise, Jagpur, dated …

Chuharmal vs cit 1988 172 itr 250

Did you know?

Web(ITAT) Order on Bofors - The Hindu

WebBench: Mukharji, Sabyasachi (J) PETITIONER: CHUHARMAL S/O TAKARMAL MOHNANI Vs. RESPONDENT: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, M.P., BHOPAL DATE OF … WebThe Revenue, to proceed against the assessee, must have definite information with regard to the assessee being in possession of monies or holding investment. This is in view of th

WebMay 30, 2024 · CHUHARMAL V. CIT, 2 May, 1988. 1988 AIR 1384, 1988 SCR (3) 788 and 172 ITR 250 . Section 110 of the Evidence Act provides that where a person was found … WebMar 12, 2016 · The expression ‘income’ under the Act, a term of wide import, is applicable to section 69A, among others, of the Act (refer: Chuharmal vs. CIT [1988] 172 ITR 250 (SC)). The assessee, claiming to have no foreign bank accounts, concedes subsequently (on the basis of a report by UBS AG, Zurich – which has been taken as part of the record) to ...

WebPunjab & Haryana H.C : Whether the Tribunal was correct in rejecting the assessee’s contention that the Explanation to s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961, gives rise to a separate charge as distinguished from the substantive provisions of s. 271 (1 ) (c) and that the provisions of the main s. 271(1)(c) having not been specifically invoked, penalty cannot …

WebThe SC in case of CHUHARMAL VS. CIT ( 1988) 172 ITR 250, has held that the provisions of Evidence Act are not applicable to the income tax proceedings, merely means that the … cleats objWebJan 4, 2013 · The principle involved, as explained by the apex court in the case of Chuharmal v. CIT [1988] 172 ITR 250 (SC), referring to section 110 of the Indian … bluetooth mediatek driverWebApr 5, 2024 · Shanta Devi vs CIT (1988) 171 ITR 532 (P&H) Where Account books of partnership firm cannot be considered to be assessee- partner’s own book of account and cash credit found therein cannot be charged to tax as assessee-partner’s income u/s 68. bluetooth media audio keeps disconnectingWebChuharmal vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax (1988) 172 ITR 250 (SC). • In the case of Dhakeshwari Cotton Mills Ltd v. bluetooth medical braceletWebGet free access to the complete judgment in M/s. Intime Credit & Holding Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi v. ITO, New Delhi on CaseMine. cleats oahuWebAll groups and messages ... ... bluetooth mechanical numpadWebApr 6, 2024 · Chuharmal Vs CIT (1988) 172 ITR 250 Smt. Srilekha Banerjee and others vs CIT 1964 AIR 697 Rajendran & Ors vs. ACIT (2006) 204 CTR (Mad) 9 Hacienda Farms … cleats north royalton happy hour